Explore Hotel Loading...
Skip to article

Dog-Friendly Stays in the Sauerland: We Counted All 2,697

Fourteen towns ranked by the share of their registered accommodation that accepts dogs — and the property type that predicts it better than any town does.

ExploreHotel Data Desk9 min read

Half of Hallenberg’s registered accommodation takes dogs. A quarter of Arnsberg’s does. Across fourteen Sauerland towns, 1,088 of the 2,697 properties that publish amenity data accept them — 40.3%. Which town you pick matters. So does the type of property, though not in the direction almost everyone assumes.

Where these numbers come from. The German National Tourist Board publishes accommodation data collected by the regional tourism boards as open data, with structured amenity flags including whether pets are welcome. We hold 3,104 records across the fourteen towns below. Of those, 2,697 publish any amenity data at all — the rest are a name and an address — and every percentage here is calculated on those 2,697. Queried 15 August 2026.

The ranking

Towns ordered by the share of their amenity-carrying accommodation that accepts dogs. Willingen (Upland) is missing on purpose; the limits section explains why.

TownWith amenity dataAccept dogsShareBarrier-free
Hallenberg381950.0%2
Bad Berleburg934548.4%5
Winterberg1,09248544.4%31
Olsberg1425941.5%6
Eslohe1034240.8%10
Brilon1415539.0%8
Meschede1134438.9%10
Bestwig652538.5%5
Attendorn682638.2%4
Lennestadt742736.5%5
Schmallenberg39414336.3%29
Medebach1806536.1%5
Sundern722433.3%8
Arnsberg1222923.8%7
Deutsche Zentrale für Tourismus open data, retrieved 15 August 2026. The denominator is properties publishing amenity data, not all 3,104 records held.

What the ranking actually tells you

Winterberg is the practical answer, not the top of the table. Hallenberg leads on percentage, but 50% of 38 properties is nineteen places, and in a February half-term week nineteen places is nothing. Winterberg’s 485 dog-friendly options are more than the other thirteen towns put together. If you are travelling in a busy week, go where the depth is.

Arnsberg is the outlier at 23.8%, more than nine points below the next town up. The obvious explanation is that Arnsberg is a real town with a higher share of hotels than holiday flats — 29 of its 122 are hotels, guesthouses or inns. That explanation does not survive the data, and the next section is why.

Property type predicts it better than town — but the opposite way round

We expected holiday flats to be the dog-friendly category. They are the least dog-friendly of the main types. Across the same 2,697 properties:

Property typePropertiesAccept dogsShare
Bauernhof (farm stay)604066.7%
Pension garni151066.7%
Hotel20611656.3%
Besondere Unterkunft14750.0%
Ferienhaus (holiday house)47421445.1%
Ferienwohnung (holiday flat)1,75665337.2%
Pension1013332.7%
Campingplatz14428.6%
Gasthof18422.2%
Wohnmobilstellplatz2100.0%
Categories with at least ten properties in the fourteen towns. Retrieved 15 August 2026.

Hotels accept dogs at 56.3%; holiday flats at 37.2%. Farm stays lead the table at 66.7%. That inverts the usual advice, and it also finishes off the structural story about Arnsberg: Hallenberg has the highest hotel share of any town here — 36.8% against Arnsberg’s 23.8% — and the highest dog rate on the list. Whatever depresses Arnsberg’s number, it is not that it has hotels.

So the practical version is the reverse of what most filters push you towards: if the flats are full or refusing, ring a hotel or a Bauernhof. The one row not to read literally is the motorhome pitches. Zero of 21 carry the pets-welcome flag, but seven of them use a different pets vocabulary entirely — that is a data artefact, not a rule against dogs on a Stellplatz.

Barrier-free is a different, and much worse, story

Across all fourteen towns, 135 properties carry the barrier-free flag — 5.0% of the total. Winterberg (31) and Schmallenberg (29) hold 44% of them between them. If you need step-free access and you are travelling with a dog, you are choosing from a handful of properties in two towns, and you should be telephoning rather than browsing. Nationally the picture is no better: 1,349 flagged in our whole German dataset.

The national picture, for context

FlagGerman records carrying it
Pets welcome8,203
Pets not permitted13,244
Family-friendly8,561
Barrier-free1,349
Of 40,942 German records held, 35,383 publish at least one amenity flag. Retrieved 15 August 2026.

So nationally, where the question is answered at all, 38.2% of German accommodation takes pets. The better Sauerland towns run well above that line; Arnsberg runs well below it.

What to actually do with this

  1. Pick for depth or for odds, not for both. Winterberg and Schmallenberg have the stock; Hallenberg and Bad Berleburg have the best chance per enquiry. In a school holiday, depth wins.
  2. Ring, don’t filter. The flag means a property told its tourist board that pets are welcome. It does not tell you the surcharge, the size limit, or whether the dog may be left alone in the room. Those three questions decide most trips and not one of them is in any dataset.
  3. If you travel by motorhome, the pitches are in here too. Campingplatz Hof Biggen at Attendorn, KNAUS Campingpark Hennesee at Meschede and the campsite at the Bruchhauser Steine near Olsberg all record dogs as allowed — and they are among the very few Sauerland entries we hold a photograph for.

What we don’t know

  • The flags are self-declared to a regional tourism board and are not audited. A property that never filled the field in appears as no data, not as no dogs, so every share here is a floor rather than a measurement.
  • The vocabularies differ between feeds, and that breaks naïve comparisons. Willingen (Upland) arrives through a different regional feed: 43 of its records publish amenity data and not one uses the pets-welcome flag. That is a finding about the feed, not about Willingen, so we excluded the town. Distrust any comparison table — ours included — that does not say how it handled this.
  • Even inside one town the vocabulary changes. Schmallenberg’s photographed hotels describe themselves in wellness terms — Sauna, Hallenbad, Massagen — and never mention pets at all. They count in the denominator and can never count in the numerator.
  • For Winterberg we hold names, addresses and flags and nothing else: 0 photographs, 0 telephone numbers and 0 websites across all 1,157 records. Region-wide we hold 327 photographs, 238 of which are Schmallenberg’s.
  • No review scores and no prices anywhere in the German data. Nothing here ranks quality or value.
  • “Sauerland” is a tourism-marketing boundary, not an administrative one. We used the fourteen towns above; Bad Berleburg is in Wittgenstein and is arguably outside it.

Sources

Deutsche Zentrale für Tourismus open-data knowledge graph (destination.one), sourced from the regional tourism boards, licensed CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA / public domain depending on the record. Retrieved 15 August 2026: 40,942 German records held, 35,383 with amenity data, 3,104 in the fourteen towns above. Hero photograph: Campingplatz Hof Biggen, Attendorn, supplied by Zweckverband Tourismusverband Biggesee-Listersee through destination.one, public domain.

More from the same catalogue

Where to stay in Schmallenberg

Properties we hold for this place, photograph first.

All hotels in Schmallenberg

ExploreHotel Data Desk

Published

The data desk writes from queries against our own copy of four European open accommodation registers. We state the denominator behind every figure, we do not reuse the registers’ own descriptions, and we do not claim to have stayed anywhere we have not.

Keep reading