Explore Hotel Loading...
Skip to article

Germany's Motorhome Pitches: All 781 We Hold, and What They Actually Tell You

The best-documented property class in the German catalogue — 72% photographed, 92% with a telephone — and the one no booking site indexes. The total moves by 250 depending on which field you ask.

ExploreHotel Data Desk9 min read

Germany has thousands of motorhome pitches. Our register holds 781 of them, and they are the best-documented property class in the entire German catalogue: 559 carry a photograph, 715 a telephone number, 702 a website. The German average is 26% photographed and 37% telephoned. Not one of the 781 can be booked through any aggregator — including this one — which is exactly why the phone number matters more than the picture.

Where these numbers come from. The German National Tourist Board publishes accommodation records collected by the regional tourism boards as open data. We hold 44,413 active German records. The 781 below are the rows filed as a Wohnmobilstellplatz in at least one of three separate fields — and the phrase “at least one of three” is doing a great deal of work, which is the first section. Every figure here was re-derived on 17 August 2026 and is quoted with the denominator it was calculated on.

781 is a decision, not a measurement

There is no single field in this register that says “this is a motorhome pitch”. There are three, they overlap imperfectly, and each one gives a different answer. The property-type field is the strictest and the category list is the loosest; the amenity tokens catch a different set again, mostly campsites and farms that happen to take motorhomes.

How the pitch is declaredPropertiesWith a photographWith a phone
Property-type field says Wohnmobilstellplatz527415472
Category list contains Wohnmobilstellplatz750542684
An amenity token names a pitch180110167
Any of the three — what this article publishes781559715
Deutsche Zentrale für Tourismus open data, retrieved 17 August 2026. The three definitions are not nested: 223 rows carry the category but not the property type, and every row that carries the property type also carries the category.

So the honest headline is a range, not a number. A reader who filters a booking site on "motorhome pitch" is filtering one of these definitions without being told which. We publish the union, we say so, and we would not defend 781 as a count of German motorhome pitches — Germany has far more. It is a count of what one open register passed through, and the register is not evenly fed.

This is not the North-Rhine-Westphalian dataset the rest of the German feed is

The German accommodation feed as a whole is heavily NRW-weighted: postcode areas 4 and 5 hold well over half of all addressed German rows. The pitches are the exception. They lean north — postcode areas 2 and 3, which is Lower Saxony, Schleswig-Holstein, Hamburg, Bremen and northern Hesse — and postcode area 1, Berlin and Brandenburg, holds not a single one.

Postcode areaPitchesPhotographedShare
3 — south Lower Saxony, north Hesse, east NRW18615080.6%
2 — Hamburg, Schleswig-Holstein, Bremen, NW Lower Saxony18114881.8%
5 — south NRW, north Rhineland-Palatinate13211486.4%
4 — north and west NRW, west Lower Saxony1307255.4%
9 — Franconia and east Thuringia4212.4%
7 — Baden-Württemberg373389.2%
6 — south Hesse, Rhineland-Palatinate, Saarland342573.5%
8 — south Bavaria211047.6%
0 — Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt, east Thuringia17635.3%
1 — Berlin, Brandenburg, Mecklenburg00
Postcode area taken from the first digit of the postcode inside the address field. 780 of the 781 rows carry a parseable postcode. Retrieved 17 August 2026.

And they are scattered rather than clustered. The 781 pitches sit in 459 different towns, and 295 of those towns hold exactly one. The largest single concentration anywhere in the set is eight — in Attendorn, Hattingen and Leer. That is the opposite shape to the hotel data, where a handful of resort towns carry thousands of rows, and it is why a pitch article cannot be a town ranking. There is nothing to rank.

Power, water and waste: the fields exist, and they are nearly always empty

A motorhome traveller wants to know four things before pulling in: can I fill up, can I empty, is there electricity, is there a shower. The register does carry tokens for all four. The published topic brief for this dataset said it did not, and that was wrong — but it was wrong in a way that barely helps you, because the tokens sit on a small minority of rows.

What the register can tell youPropertiesOf all 781Of the 559 with amenity data
Waste-water or chemical-toilet disposal13517.3%24.2%
Electricity at the pitch13517.3%24.2%
Sanitary block with WC or showers11014.1%19.7%
Wi-Fi10213.1%18.2%
Fresh-water supply759.6%13.4%
Distinct properties carrying at least one token in each group; the vocabulary is inconsistent and each group unions several spellings (disposal alone has seven, from Entsorgungsstelle für Reisemobile to Allgemeine Abwasserentsorgung). 559 of the 781 rows carry any amenity token at all. Retrieved 17 August 2026.

Read those columns the right way round. 135 pitches say they have a disposal point. That is not the same as 646 pitches having none — 222 rows carry no amenity data whatsoever, and among the 559 that do, the boards fill the field inconsistently. The number is a floor. It is useful for finding a pitch with a service point and useless for ruling one out.

The 559 photographs are not 559 photographs

This is the correction we would most want a reader to carry away. Counting the rows that carry an image address gives 559. Counting distinct image URLs gives 502 — so 73 rows are showing a picture that also belongs to another property. And 46 rows carry an image whose own file name announces that it is not a photograph of the place at all.

symbolbild-wohnmobil.jpg — one file, twenty properties, fifteen towns in the Bergisches Land. stockfoto-wohnmobilstellplatz.png — fifteen properties across the Ruhr. blindbild_wohnmobilstellplatz.jpg — four, all in Attendorn.
File names as they appear in the register

Deduplicated and destocked, 484 of the 781 pitches carry a photograph that is plausibly of that pitch — 62%, not 72%. We have not opened all 484, so treat even that as an upper bound. It does not change the finding that this is the best-illustrated class in the German data; it changes what you should expect when you click one.

Dogs: the most permissive class in the German register, by a distance

German amenity vocabulary is a minefield here, because the phrase that means “pets not permitted” contains the word that means “pets” — a substring filter counts 13,244 refusals as permissions. Matching on the audited token set instead, and counting only the properties that answer the question at all, the pitches are extraordinary: five of them say no.

ClassAnsweredDogs yesDogs noShare yes
Motorhome pitches193167586.5%
Campsites2261713975.7%
All German accommodation22,6128,96813,25139.7%
Answered means the row carries at least one pet token of any polarity; 31 pitches and 33 campsites answer on request and are counted in the denominator but not as a yes. Retrieved 17 August 2026.

But the denominator is 193, not 781. Only a quarter of the pitches answer the pets question, and the ones that bother to answer are self-selecting towards yes. The published Sauerland dog article found zero of twenty-one Sauerland pitches flagged as dog-friendly and called it a data artefact; nationally that reading holds up.

How to actually use this

  1. Telephone. 715 of the 781 have a number and none of them have a booking link. The whole catalogue contains thirteen booking links and not one is attached to a pitch. This is a directory to ring, not a shelf to book from.
  2. Do not trust an empty field. Absent power, absent disposal and absent opening dates all look identical here, and they mean “not published”, not “not there”. Ask the four questions on the phone.
  3. Search by region, not by town. With 295 towns holding a single pitch, the useful unit is the postcode area or the tourist board, not the place name.
  4. Expect a stock photo roughly one time in eight, and expect it most in the Bergisches Land and the Ruhr, where two files cover thirty-five properties between them.

Three pitches where the register earns its keep

All three carry their own photograph, a telephone number and a website — and all three declare a disposal point, which puts them in the 17% that answer that question at all.

What we don't know

  • No opening season, no price, no pitch count, no maximum stay, no height barrier. These are the five things a motorhome traveller decides on and the register holds none of them.
  • The class boundary with campsites is soft. 227 of these 781 rows are also filed as a campsite, so a quarter of them may be a pitch inside a campsite rather than a standalone aire. We have written that up separately in Germany's campsites.
  • Amenity flags are self-declared to a regional board and are not audited. Nothing here has been verified by anyone, including us.
  • The feed is not a market. Postcode area 1 holding zero pitches is a statement about Berlin and Brandenburg's tourism boards, not about whether you can park a motorhome there.
  • We hold no ADAC, DTV or Bord Atlas grading for any pitch, and no service-point type. Where a pitch has an official grade, it is not in this data.
  • Duplicates exist. Some pitches are filed twice, from two different regional feeds, with two different photographs and two different phone formats.

Sources

Deutsche Zentrale für Tourismus open-data knowledge graph (destination.one), sourced from the regional tourism boards and licensed CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA / public domain depending on the record. Retrieved 17 August 2026: 44,413 active German records held, 781 in the pitch union above. Hero photograph: Wohnmobilstellplatz »Reisemobile Otterndorf«, Otterndorf, supplied by Cuxland-Tourismus through destination.one under CC BY 4.0.

More from the same catalogue

Where to stay in Otterndorf

Properties we hold for this place, photograph first.

All hotels in Otterndorf

ExploreHotel Data Desk

Published

The data desk writes from queries against our own copy of four European open accommodation registers. We state the denominator behind every figure, we do not reuse the registers’ own descriptions, and we do not claim to have stayed anywhere we have not.

Keep reading